Prognostic value of Systemic Inflammation Index (SII) in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) patients treated with pembrolizumab and lenvatinib: retrospective observational study experience
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background To evaluate the association between baseline Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic endometrial cancer (EC) treated with pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib (Len-Pem) in a real-world setting. Secondary objectives included assessment of SII in relation to overall survival (OS), adverse events (AEs), treatment discontinuations, dose modifications, and post-progression therapies. Methods This is a monocentric, observational, retrospective/ambispective study including 53 patients with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) EC treated with pembrolizumab-lenvatinib (Len-Pem). Results Fifty-three patients were enrolled, with a median age of 64 years. Median PFS in the overall population was 7.1 months; median OS was 15 months. Patients with baseline SII < 540 had significantly longer PFS (12.5 months) compared to those with SII ≥ 540 (5.5 months; HR 2.94, p = 0.004). Higher SII was also significantly associated with increased risk of specific toxicities, including nausea, anorexia, and vomiting. The Overall Response Rate (ORR) was 42%, and Disease Control Rate (DCR) was 71%. The majority of patients (79%) required lenvatinib dose reductions. Adverse events of any grade were frequent, with fatigue (58%), hypertension (50%), and hypothyroidism (48%) being the most common. Conclusion Our real-world study supports the prognostic role of SII in predicting outcomes and toxicity in EC patients treated with Len-Pem. SII may serve as a cost-effective, accessible biomarker to stratify patients and guide clinical decision-making. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate its clinical utility and to optimize dosing strategies that balance efficacy and tolerability.