Use of Electronic Health Records to Examine Margin-to-Reflex Distance in Normal Patients

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Purpose To characterize normative margin-to-reflex distance 1 (MRD1) measurements across different demographic factors, age, sex, race, and ethnicity, using a large electronic health record-derived (EHR) dataset. Methods This was a single-institution observational, cross-sectional study of adult patients seen in an academic oculoplastics division from October 2018 to June 2023. MRD1 values were extracted from structured data fields and free-text progress notes. Patients with diagnoses known to affect MRD1 (e.g. dermatochalasis, ptosis) were excluded from the study. Univariate analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA and post hoc testing, while multivariable analysis testing was done through a linear mixed-effects regression model. Results A total of 6231 patients and 11,932 normative MRD1 values were analyzed. MRD1 decreased by approximately 0.2 millimeters (mm) per decade of life (p < 0.001). Female sex was associated with higher MRD1 measurements (3.38 vs 3.003, p < 0.001), while Asian race was associated with lower MRD1 values (2.99 vs 3.32, p < 0.001). Conclusions Normative MRD1 values vary significantly by age, sex, and race. These findings establish a clinical reference for MRD1 accounting for demographic factors.

Article activity feed