Disparities in Timeliness of Cancer Diagnosis Across a Multi-Site Academic Health System

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Early cancer diagnosis improves survival and quality of life, yet disparities in stage at diagnosis persist. This study evaluates demographic, clinical, insurance, and neighborhood-level socioeconomic factors associated with late-stage cancer diagnosis within an academic health system. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 27,064 adults diagnosed with breast, colorectal, or lung and bronchus cancer between 2015 and 2025 in the University of California Health System. Late-stage disease was defined as AJCC stage III/IV. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations between late-stage diagnosis and patient characteristics, insurance status, comorbidity burden, and neighborhood socioeconomic measures, including the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), and Healthy Places Index (HPI). Results 17.6% of patients were diagnosed at a late stage. Cancer type was the strongest predictor, with lung (aOR ≈ 13–14) and colorectal cancer (aOR ≈ 8) associated with higher odds of late-stage diagnosis compared with breast cancer. Residence in medium and high ADI tertiles and Medicaid insurance (OR = 1.16; 95% CI: 1.06–1.28) were associated with higher odds of late-stage diagnosis, while Veterans Affairs coverage was associated with lower odds (OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.58–1.01). SVI was not associated with stage at diagnosis, whereas higher HPI scores were modestly protective. Conclusion Late-stage cancer diagnosis is driven primarily by cancer type and insurance status, with additional contributions from neighborhood disadvantage.

Article activity feed