Cross-classification of bone mass status and possible sarcopenia delineates a gradient in fall risk: parallel concordance of BMD severity, fragility-fracture burden, and bone turnover biomarker profiles

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Falls and related fragility fractures are common and consequential in community-dwelling older adults, yet bone mineral density (BMD) alone does not fully capture fall-related vulnerability.As skeletal and functional impairment may progress asynchronously, we performed a cross-classification based on bone mass status and possible sarcopenia to evaluate whether it identifies a gradient in fall risk and demonstrates parallel trends in BMD severity, fragility-fracture burden, and bone turnover biomarkers. Methods Baseline data were analyzed cross-sectionally in 1786 participants with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived lumbar spine and total hip measures, available physical-function measures (handgrip strength and/or chair-stand testing), and fall history in the prior year. Outcomes were any fall (≥ 1) and recurrent falls (≥ 2) in the prior year. Stepwise-adjusted regression models estimated associations with 95% confidence intervals and derived marginal standardized risks and risk differences; trends, interactions, and restricted cubic splines were evaluated. Parallel outcomes included continuous T-scores, prior fracture history, and biomarkers of bone turnover (β-CTx, PINP, osteocalcin, alkaline phosphatase) and total 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Results The prevalence of any fall (≥1) increased stepwise across strata, from 12.8% in participants with normal bone mass without possible sarcopenia to 27.1% in those with osteoporosis and possible sarcopenia. In fully adjusted analyses, standardized risk was 14.8% versus 22.2% ( P for trend = 0.032), and the odds ratio for any fall was 1.68 (95% CI 1.01–2.79). Recurrent-fall estimates were directionally consistent but less precise. Lumbar spine and hip T-scores declined monotonically across strata; within osteoporosis, possible sarcopenia was associated with a further reduction in hip T-score (adjusted mean difference −0.24, 95% CI −0.39 to −0.09). Prior fragility fractures accumulated across strata. Bone turnover markers shifted upward, while total 25-hydroxyvitamin D trended modestly downward. Dose–response patterns for grip strength, chair-stand time, and T-scores were supported by spline analyses, and sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary findings. Conclusions A joint “bone–function” stratification yields a reproducible fall-risk gradient with parallel clinical and metabolic correlates, providing a testable framework for longitudinal validation and risk phenotyping.

Article activity feed