Prognostic Value and Therapeutic Response Prediction of BRAF, RAS, and TERT Gene Mutations in Thyroid Cancer: A Large-Scale Analysis Based on the Cosmic Database

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective : To systematically evaluate the distribution characteristics of key gene mutations (BRAF, RAS [HRAS, KRAS, NRAS], TERT) in thyroid cancer, explore their correlations with clinicopathological features, prognosis, and therapeutic response, and construct a polygenic prognostic prediction model. Methods : Thyroid cancer-related clinical sample data were downloaded from the Cosmic Database (v99, accessed on March 15, 2024), and qualified samples were included using strict screening criteria. Mutation frequency statistics, chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression model, and pathway enrichment analysis were performed using R 4.2.1 software. Results : A total of 12,867 thyroid cancer samples were included, consisting of papillary carcinoma (72.3%), follicular carcinoma (13.5%), medullary carcinoma (8.7%), and anaplastic carcinoma (5.5%). The BRAF V600E mutation had the highest frequency (43.8%), predominantly enriched in papillary carcinoma. The RAS family mutation rate was 21.5%, with NRAS Q61R as the major variant, most prevalent in follicular carcinoma (38.2%). The TERT promoter mutation rate was 15.7%, associated with advanced tumor stage and high invasiveness. Patients with BRAF V600E mutation had significantly shortened recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR=2.31, 95% CI:1.98-2.69, P<0.001) and poor response to radioactive iodine therapy (response rate: 31.2% vs. 68.5% in wild-type, P<0.001). Patients with concurrent BRAF V600E and TERT mutations had the worst prognosis (median overall survival [OS]: 5.2 years vs. 8.7 years in single mutation groups vs. 12.3 years in wild-type, P<0.001). The polygenic prognostic model constructed based on BRAF, RAS, and TERT achieved an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI:0.75-0.81), outperforming the traditional clinical staging model (AUC=0.65). Conclusion : BRAF, RAS, and TERT gene mutations are key predictive factors for prognosis and therapeutic response in thyroid cancer. The polygenic combined model provides a reference for clinical individualized treatment decisions.​

Article activity feed