Swimming Toward Recovery: Mapping Research on Dolphin Therapy and Cerebral Palsy through Bibliometric Analysis

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Dolphin-assisted therapy (DAT) has gained increasing attention as a complementary intervention for children with cerebral palsy. However, the scientific literature remains poorly mapped and conceptually inconsistent, frequently conflating this pediatric neurodevelopmental condition with adult-onset neurodegenerative disorders—particularly Parkinson’s disease—thereby raising concerns about clinical relevance and theoretical coherence. Data and Methods: We conducted a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of 373 peer-reviewed articles indexed in Scopus (1993–2025). Using a systematic keyword-based search strategy, we analyzed publication trends, collaboration networks, institutional productivity, and thematic evolution. Data were processed and visualized using Bibliometrix (via Biblioshiny) and VOSviewer, employing co-occurrence analysis, overlay visualization, and strategic diagram mapping to delineate the intellectual structure and developmental trajectory of the field. Results Publications increased annually by 11.21%, peaking at 40 in 2024, with strong collaboration (6.64 co-authors/article) and 24.9% international co-authorship. Research is led by a few authors (LEE, PHIL-HYU; ZOGALA, DAVID) and institutions (Yonsei University; UC San Diego). Most papers appear in neurology journals like Movement Disorders and Parkinsonism and Related Disorders . Keyword analysis identified three clusters: clinical studies, preclinical mechanistic research, and Parkinson’s biomarker work. Temporal patterns shifted from clinical (2016–2018) to mechanistic (2019–2020) to translational (2021–2022). Thematic mapping revealed underdeveloped female- and sex-specific research compared to motor-related male-focused studies. Conclusion Despite growing output, the field is misaligned framed through adult Parkinson’s paradigms despite targeting children with a non-progressive condition. The neglect of pediatric specificity, sex differences, and experiential dimensions limits clinical relevance. Future research must prioritize developmentally appropriate, patient-centered, and methodologically rigorous inquiry to determine whether dolphin therapy offers genuine therapeutic value or remains an unproven intervention shaped more by narrative than evidence.

Article activity feed