Efficacy of Steroid-Omitting Antiemetic Therapy in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer receiving Nano-liposomal Irinotecan plus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background : Nano-liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (Nal-IRI/FL) is an established second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). Standard antiemetic prophylaxis for this moderately emetogenic regimen includes a 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT₃) receptor antagonist and dexamethasone (Dex). However, steroid use may exacerbate glucose intolerance in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), and an evidence supporting Dex-omitting antiemetic strategy remains limited. Methods : We retrospectively compared efficacy of prophylactic antiemetic therapy between Dex-omitting (no steroid use) and Dex-sparing (on day1) in combination with a 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3) receptor antagonist and neurokinin-1 (NK1) in patients with APC who received Nal-IRI/FL from October 2020 to August 2024. The primary outcome was a total control (TC) rate of nausea and vomiting without rescue medication within 120 hours. Results : Patients were categorized into Dex-sparing (n=61) and Dex-omitting (n=13) groups according to use of Dex in antiemetic prophylaxis. Baseline characteristics were comparable except for a higher prevalence of DM in the Dex-omitting group (31% vs. 100%, P < 0.01). The TC rate did not differ between the two groups (80% vs. 69%, P = 0.46). The relative dose intensity of Nal-IRI and 5-FU was slightly higher in the Dex-omitting group (Nal-IRI: 55% vs. 62%; 5-FU: 59% vs. 68%). Progression-free survival (median: 5.2 vs. 5.0 months, P = 0.84) and overall survival (median: 10.1 vs. 9.4 months, P = 0.56) were also similar. Conclusions : Steroid-omitting antiemetic therapy with a 5-HT₃ receptor antagonist and an NK₁ receptor antagonist is a feasible option without compromising safety and efficacy of Nal-IRI/FL.

Article activity feed