Nocturia in the UK: public knowledge, self-management practices and advice-seeking behaviours: A cross-sectional study
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Objectives To determine nocturia prevalence, public knowledge of LUTS and nocturia risk factors, self-management practices, and advice-seeking behaviours among UK community-dwelling adults, and to examine demographic associations. Design a cross-sectional online survey. Setting Community-based, United Kingdom. Participants 2,062 UK adults accessed the survey; 2,012 provided complete socio-demographic data for analysis (50.2% female, 49.8% male; 81.7% White, 9.4% Asian/Asian British; aged 18–65 + years); convenience sampling via online panels and networks, with informed consent. Interventions None (observational survey study). Primary and secondary outcome measures Prevalence of LUTS/nocturia; awareness of symptoms/risk factors; self-management strategies; advice sources; demographic associations. Results Among respondents, 52.7% reported experiencing nocturia, with 42.2% having symptoms nightly and 47.1% waking at least twice per night. While 90.5% recognised fluid intake before bed as a cause, knowledge of other risk factors (e.g., cardiovascular disease, salt intake, sleep disorders) was limited. Nearly half (43.2%) of those with symptoms had never sought advice; only 27% sought professional input. Online resources (e.g., NHS website, Google) were consulted more frequently than HCPs. Age, sex, ethnicity, long-term condition status and disability were associated with variations in awareness and advice-seeking behaviours. Conclusions Nocturia is highly prevalent, but advice-seeking is quite low. While awareness of behavioural contributors is relatively good, several contributing medical conditions and other health-related factors were less known. These findings highlight a need for national health literacy campaigns focused on specific risk factors, evidence-based self-care tools and greater professional engagement. Addressing these gaps can normalise discussions about bladder health, reduce stigma and improve early detection and management of LUTS in the community.