Bridging Knowledge Silos in Mountain Watersheds: How Disciplinary and Territorial Gaps Threaten River Governance

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Sustainable watershed governance often fails not due to a lack of biophysical data, but due to fragmented social and disciplinary understandings of ecosystem services (ES). This study investigates these "knowledge silos" in the high-Andean region of Ecuador, analyzing the Yanuncay and Tomebamba river basins. Using a transdisciplinary mixed-methods design, we integrated rural and urban focus groups with surveys of university students and faculty across Biology, Engineering, Tourism, and Education. Results reveal a critical duality a critical duality: while Biology and Engineering respondents demonstrate high ecological literacy, students in Education—pivotal for future societal awareness—exhibit significant gaps in understanding ES functionality. Territorially, a sharp disconnect emerged: rural communities prioritize "survival-based" provisioning services (water supply, raw materials), whereas urban populations frame rivers primarily through "experience-based" cultural values (recreation, aesthetics). These findings expose a structural barrier to sustainability: technical solutions clash with pedagogical deficits and conflicting urban-rural priorities. It is argued that effective management requires moving beyond technical monitoring to establish a "River Basin Knowledge Council" that explicitly bridges the gap between scientific expertise, pedagogical training, and local lived experiences.

Article activity feed