Risk of all-cause mortality in elderly patients with hip fractures treated with denosumab
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background Hip fractures markedly increase the risk of all-cause mortality and subsequent fractures. Although prior meta-analyses and clinical trials such as Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with zoledronic acid Once Yearly (HORIZON ) Recurrent Fracture Trial have suggested that zoledronic acid may reduce mortality, large-scale database studies are often limited by residual confounding. AIM Using detailed clinical data from a geriatric fracture center, this study evaluated whether denosumab treatment reduces mortality in real-world elderly hip fracture patients. Methods This cohort study included 738 patients aged ≥ 65 years with fragility hip fracture. The treatment group (n = 368) received at least one dose of denosumab postoperatively plus calcium/vitamin D, while the control group (n = 370) received calcium/vitamin D only. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality. Multivariate Cox models were used to adjust for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and other potential confounders. Results During follow-up, 62 deaths (8.4%) occurred. Male (HR = 2.61, 95% CI: 1.38–4.92, p = 0.003), age ≥ 85 years (HR = 10.40, 95% CI: 3.82–28.33, p < 0.001), and CCI > 3 (HR = 7.40, 95% CI: 2.91–18.82, p < 0.001) were significant risk factors for mortality. Denosumab use was not associated with reduced mortality(p = 0.730), even after multiple doses (p = 0.890). Notably, advanced age was strongly associated with non-adherence (OR = 6.90, 95% CI: 2.31–20.83, p = 0.001). Conclusion In this real-world cohort of high-risk elderly patients with hip fracture, denosumab did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality. Advanced age was not only a predictor of mortality but also a critical barrier to treatment adherence. These findings highlight a “treatment paradox” in this vulnerable population and underscore the need for pragmatic trials and integrated multidisciplinary strategies to improve both treatment implementation and outcomes.