Psychometric Validation of the PROISCD-CG Scale in Patients With Chronic Gastritis: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Chronic gastritis (CG) is a common gastrointestinal condition that adversely affects patients’ physical, psychological, and social functioning. With increasing emphasis on patient-centered care, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have become essential for evaluating disease burden and treatment effectiveness. Compared with conventional quality-of-life (QOL) instruments, PRO scales offer superior sensitivity, symptom specificity, and clinical interpretability. This study assessed the reliability and validity of the Patient-Reported Clinical Outcome Scale for Chronic Gastritis (PROISCD-CG) using structural equation modeling (SEM). Methods: A total of 174 outpatients and inpatients diagnosed with CG between September and December 2022 were surveyed using the PROISCD-CG scale. Internal consistency, split-half reliability, and criterion validity (with SF-36 as the external criterion) were evaluated. SEM was applied to examine and refine factor structures, assess model fit, and evaluate convergent and discriminant validity. Results: The total scale demonstrated strong reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.87; split-half = 0.77). Criterion validity against SF-36 was acceptable, with moderate correlations across corresponding domains. The initial SEM model showed suboptimal fit, but modifications—removing low-loading items and adding error covariances—substantially improved fit indices (CFI, IFI, GFI approaching 0.80; RMSEA = 0.082). Convergent validity (AVE) and composite reliability (CR) generally met recommended thresholds, and discriminant validity was acceptable. Conclusions: The PROISCD-CG scale exhibits good psychometric properties and can serve as a reliable and valid tool for assessing patient-centered outcomes in CG. Items with low factor loadings require refinement and further testing in larger cohorts. PRO-based evaluation provides advantages over traditional QOL metrics by more precisely capturing symptom burden, functional impairment, and treatment responsiveness.

Article activity feed