Effects of an 80-10-10 Multilingual CTCA-Harlybot Model on Achievement and Critical Thinking in Mobile and Adaptive Systems

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

This study compared the effects of three instructional approaches on university students’ achievement (retention) and critical-thinking skills in a Mobile and Adaptive Systems course: (a) traditional lecture, (b) Harlybot-supported Culturo-Techno-Contextual Approach (CTCA) delivered in 100% English (monolingual), and (c) Harlybot-supported CTCA using an 80% English + 10% Nigerian Pidgin + 10% Yoruba strategic code-switching model (80-10-10 multilingual). A pre-post quasi-experimental design with 75 second-year undergraduates was employed. Cognitive Task Analysis (CTA) had previously identified the OSI Model as the most difficult concept, justifying the intervention focus. MANCOVA (covariates: pre-tests) revealed no significant differences in achievement (retention) or critical-thinking scores across the three conditions (p > .05). However, the 80-10-10 multilingual group consistently displayed the highest adjusted means on both outcomes, with moderate-to-large effect sizes (η² = .09–.14). Qualitative data from think-aloud protocols and post-intervention focus groups explained the pattern: brief, culturally anchored code-switches at OSI encapsulation/de-encapsulation moments reduced extraneous cognitive load and increased germane processing without compromising academic identity. The findings extend Okebukola’s Eco-Techno-Cultural Theory by quantifying the optimal cultural-linguistic dosage (≤ 20%) for cognitively demanding computing topics in African multilingual universities.

Article activity feed