Clinical characteristics and response to standard-of-care treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with or without anti-ribonucleoprotein (RNP) antibodies: An Australian, multi-centre cohort study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Anti-ribonucleoprotein (RNP) (auto)antibodies are frequently detected in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) although their associations with SLE disease activity remain incompletely understood. We compared socio-demographics and clinical characteristics between adult patients with SLE with or without anti-RNP antibodies (RNP+ vs. RNP-). Methods: We used data from a national, multicentre registry of SLE patients in Australia, collected prospectively between 2007 and 2023. Anti-RNP status and other serological profiles along with demographics were recorded at enrolment. At each routine clinic visit, medication details and disease activity indicators (SLEDAI-2K, PGA) were captured, and treat-to-target (T2T) states, lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) and DORIS remission (REM), were determined. Clinical characteristics were compared between RNP+ and RNP- patients at 6 months (182±30 days) and 12 months (365±30 days) from enrolment. Results: A total of 587 patients were studied. 174 (29.6% (95%CI: 26.1%, 33.4%)) were RNP+ with significantly higher disease activity and more medication use at enrolment compared with RNP- patients (SLEDAI-2K median [IQR]: 8.0 [4.0, 10.0] vs. 4.0 [2.0, 8.0], p<0.001; PGA: 0.9 [0.4, 1.2] vs. 0.5 [0.2, 1.0], p<0.001; daily glucocorticoid dose 6.8 [0.0, 15.0] vs. 3.0 [0.0, 10.0] mg/day, p<0.001). RNP+ group had more patients with vasculitis, renal, cutaneous, serological, and constitutional activity. At enrolment, a greater proportion of RNP+ patients had active disease (SLEDAI-2K ≥6) compared with RNP- patients (53% versus 41%, p<0.007). Accordingly, significantly fewer RNP+ patients were in LLDAS (20% vs. 32.2%, p-value=0.004) or REM (11.6% vs. 22.6%, p-value=0.006). Follow-up data were available for 344 patients at 6 months (n=101, 29.4% RNP+), and for 298 patients at 12 months (n=87, 29.2% RNP+). Disease activity indicators between RNP+ and RNP- groups converged within the first 12 months following enrolment. While significantly fewer RNP+ patients achieved T2T states at 6 months, comparable proportions of RNP+ and RNP- patients were in T2T states by 12 months. Glucocorticoid and immunosuppressant use remained significantly higher in RNP+ patients throughout follow-up. Conclusions: Anti-RNP positive patients presented with a higher burden of disease activity at enrolment, and required more intensive treatment with glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants during the first year since study of follow-up.

Article activity feed