Are Conservative Ratings More Accurate? An Evaluation and Comparison of RMBS Ratings

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

We compare the levels and accuracies of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) ratings from S&P, Moody’s, Fitch, and DBRS and find the following. While DBRS ratings are the most conservative, they have the lowest discriminatory power of default risk in short-, intermediate-, and long-term horizons. In addition, DBRS ratings have little or no incremental predictive power for default beyond that of other CRAs on joint-rated RMBS. In contrast, S&P ratings are the most generous yet have the highest discriminatory power of default risk. The superior performance of S&P ratings can be attributed to a balanced trade-off between early warnings of default and false alarms. The findings highlight the differences between conservative ratings and accurate ratings.

Article activity feed