Effect of tidal volume on tolerance to hemorrhage and resuscitation requirements: an experimental study in ventilated piglets

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Introduction: Hemorrhagic shock is a life-threatening condition requiring rapid management. Mechanical ventilation, frequently initiated early in emergency care, influences systemic hemodynamics, yet the impact of tidal volume during hypovolemia remains poorly defined. Objectives: The primary objective of this experimental study was to compare the median depletion volume (MDV) of blood required to induce hypotension (mean arterial pressure [MAP] = 40 mmHg) according to tidal volume in mechanically ventilated piglets. The secondary objective was to compare the median transfusion volume (MTV) required to achieve a MAP ≥ 60 mmHg. Methodology: Twenty-three anesthetized piglets were allocated to three ventilation strategies: low tidal volume (LV, 6 mL·kg⁻¹; n = 7), medium tidal volume (MV, 8 mL·kg⁻¹; n = 8), and high tidal volume (HV, 10 mL·kg⁻¹; n = 8). Hemorrhagic shock was induced by controlled blood withdrawal until a MAP of 40 mmHg was reached, followed by resuscitation using autologous whole blood transfusion. Results: The MDV did not differ between groups: 30 (25–39) mL·kg⁻¹ in the LV group, 37 (35–39) mL·kg⁻¹ in the MV group, and 40 (33–41) mL·kg⁻¹ in the HV group (p = 0.34). The MTV tended to be higher with increasing tidal volume: 10 (7–10), 10 (10–13), and 12 (10–14) mL·kg⁻¹ in the LV, MV, and HV groups, respectively (p = 0.09). Conclusion: Tidal volume did not influence tolerance to hemorrhage during active blood loss. Higher tidal volumes were associated with greater transfusion requirements during resuscitation, although differences did not reach statistical significance.

Article activity feed