Efficacy of 980 nm Diode Laser Versus Ultrasonic Activation in Root Canal Disinfection Against Enterococcus faecalis: A Comparative In Vitro Study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background This study aimed to evaluate the decontamination efficacy of a 980 nm diode laser against Enterococcus faecalis in comparison with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) activated with the passive ultrasonic technique (pui). Methods Thirty-nine single-rooted teeth were instrumented and then inoculated with E. faecalis for 4 weeks to form mature biofilms. The specimens were randomly assigned into 3 groups: the control group (n = 7, no treatment), Diode Laser (n = 16, 1W, 980 nm, pulsed mode), Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI) with 5.25% NaOCl (n = 16). Bacterial samples were collected before and after the interventions, and colony-forming units (CFUs) were counted. Results Both experimental interventions showed a significant reduction in bacterial counts compared to the control group (P < 0.001). The Diode Laser (92.30%), PUI + NaOCl (88.97%). The diode laser alone was significantly more effective than ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI) (P < 0.05). Conclusions The diode laser 980 nm demonstrated a greater antibacterial impact than (PUI) with5.25% NaOCl. However, 5.25% NaOCl was still successful in reducing bacteria, and the two methods are effective.

Article activity feed