Combining Network Toxicology with Machine Learning and Experiment Validation to Analyze the Molecular Mechanism and Core Target Screening of Aristolochic Acid Nephropathy
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
This study aimed to comprehensively investigate the possible toxicity and molecular mechanisms of aristolochic acid (AA)-induced aristolochic acid nephropathy (AAN) and to provide a scientific basis for its prevention and treatment. Using network toxicology, machine learning, multidimensional bioinformatics, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation, the study first collected AA targets and AAN-related targets from multiple databases. After integration and deduplication, 290 intersecting targets were identified. Functional pathways were then explored through gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and support vector machines (SVM) algorithms were used to pinpoint core targets. The expression and diagnostic relevance of these core targets were verified using Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets. Immune infiltration analysis was performed, and molecular docking and dynamics simulations were performed to construct adverse outcome pathways (AOP). Finally, The expression of core genes was measured in HK2 cells after 48 hours of intervention with AA. Results showed that the intersectional targets were primarily enriched in lipid metabolism and related pathways. Three core targets, solute carrier family 1 member 3 (SLC1A3), CAMP-specific phosphodiesterase 4B (PDE4B), and fatty acid binding protein 3 (FABP3), were identified, all with area under the curve (AUC) values > 0.9, demonstrating high diagnostic specificity and association with multiple immune cell infiltrations. Molecular docking revealed that AA binding energies to all three core targets were <-5 kcal/mol, with the strongest binding to PDE4B (-8.6 kcal/mol). Molecular dynamics simulations verified the stability of the complex. qRT-PCR results confirmed that the mRNA levels of FABP3, PDE4B, and SLC1A3 were elevated in the AA group. Finally, constructed AOP revealed that AA induced AAN by regulating core targets, affecting lipid metabolism and the immune microenvironment. In conclusion, PDE4B, FABP3, and SLC1A3 are potential diagnostic biomarkers for AAN. AA may induce AAN by regulating these targets and related pathways, providing new avenues for the study of the mechanisms and prevention of AAN.