From Mindfulness to Non-attachment: A Science Mapping Study of Buddhist Psychology Research
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Objectives Buddhist psychology research has expanded rapidly but remains conceptually heterogeneous and difficult to synthesize across partially connected clinical, contemplative, and well-being subfields. This study maps the thematic structure, intellectual foundations, temporal evolution, and collaboration patterns of Buddhist psychology scholarship to clarify dominant research streams and emerging frontiers. Methods Following a Bibliometric-Systematic Literature Review workflow, we searched the Web of Science Core Collection (1962–2025) using the topic query (“buddhist psychology” OR (buddh* NEAR/1 psycholog*)). From 219 retrieved records, we excluded non–peer-reviewed formats, early access, non-English records, and tangential items, yielding 142 English-language journal articles. We conducted science-mapping analyses in VOSviewer, combining keyword co-occurrence clustering and overlay (time-zone) visualization with co-citation, bibliographic coupling, and co-authorship network analysis (with interpretability thresholds such as minimum publications for authors and minimum document counts for countries). Results Keyword co-occurrence revealed four interlocking thematic hotspots: (1) mindfulness, acceptance, and self-compassion mechanisms in emotional distress (stress, anxiety, depression, mechanisms, validation); (2) Buddhist psychology and meditative awareness (meditation, consciousness, awareness, psychotherapy translation); (3) compassion and empathy for health and well-being (prosocial capacities in clinical, health, and organizational contexts); and (4) nonattachment and Buddhist-informed well-being pathways (letting go, stress reduction, flourishing). Temporal mapping indicated a shift from early conceptual emphases (religion, consciousness, phenomenology) toward intervention- and outcomes-oriented research, with recent growth in mechanisms, validation, meta-analysis, and nonattachment. Conclusions Buddhist psychology is consolidating into a mature applied science anchored by mindfulness, Buddhism, and meditation, while increasingly advancing distinctively Buddhist self-related constructs, particularly nonattachment. Future work should strengthen construct clarity, psychometric robustness, and mechanism-driven, context-sensitive testing across populations and settings.