Rational STEM Instruction Through Evidence-Based Practice

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background STEM education is typically delivered in teacher-facilitated classroom settings. In these environments, evidence-based practice (EBP) research aims to promote interdisciplinary integration, foster a positive classroom culture, and support competency-based learning. These goals are closely tied to behavioral, cognitive, and affective dimensions of engagement—a complex dynamic that may challenge instructors' capacity for real-time assessment and instructional adjustment. While certain EBPs seem to be associated with measurable improvements in classroom engagement, tools for assessing both EBP implementation and engagement metrics in STEM contexts have developed in isolation and lack a cohesive, integrative framework. Method STEM education research requires a solid foundation for EBPs that integrate the three dimensions of teacher, student, and curriculum dynamics within the classroom habitus. This study examines an EBP model grounded in these dimensions, which we term a rational instruction evidence-based practice (RIEBP) model, addressing how classroom cultures shape engagement and learning. Data from 126 STEM classrooms—compiled from teacher and student reports—revealed alignment between exploratory and confirmatory evidence structures, supporting the model’s construct validity. Additionally, the study advances tools to measure student comprehension-building, the formation of collaborative instructional communities, and the implementation efficacy of interdisciplinary, problem-driven, and science-based EBPs. Conclusions This study enhances instructor understanding of classroom engagement dynamics in classroom environments by implementing an RIEBP model. Through systematic analysis of 126 STEM classrooms, we asses three critical classroom engagement dimensions—behavioral, cognitive, and affective—while evaluating pedagogical responsiveness, curriculum effectiveness, and learner motivation. To measure the impact of the RIEBP framework, we developed and validated Student Curriculum Investment Instrument (SCII), a novel tool for quantifying engagement in evidence-based STEM instruction.

Article activity feed