Standardized Care Pathways Mitigate Occupational Disparities in Pregnancy Outcomes Among Nulliparous Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Propensity-Score-Matched Study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to determine whether employment status influences pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) who received standardized care. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of deliveries (2020–2024) at a tertiary hospital. To minimize parity-related confounding, the primary analysis was restricted to nulliparous women with GDM (n = 240). Propensity-score matching (1:1, caliper = 0.15) based on age, height, and pre-pregnancy BMI generated 62 matched employed–unemployed pairs. Continuous and categorical outcomes were compared using Student's t-test/Mann–Whitney U test and χ²/Fisher's exact test, respectively. Results In the full cohort (n = 595), employed women had a lower pre-pregnancy BMI than unemployed women (21.80 vs. 22.21 kg/m², p = 0.039). After matching, no significant differences were observed between groups in gestational weight gain (12.1 ± 3.8 kg vs. 11.3 ± 4.5 kg, p = 0.331), cesarean delivery rate (27.4% vs. 37.1%, p = 0.252), gestational age at delivery (39.3 vs. 39.2 weeks, p = 0.695), or fetal birth weight (3101 ± 365 vs. 3225 ± 353 g, p = 0.073). Conclusions Standardized, protocol-driven GDM care eliminated perinatal disparities associated with employment status, although a pre-pregnancy BMI gap persisted. Investment in equitable, high-quality antenatal programs may serve as an actionable strategy to advance health equity in GDM management by 2030.

Article activity feed