Clinical Efficacy Research on the Efficacy and Safety of Hysteroscopic Micro-scissors Combined with a Intrauterine Bigatti Shaver for Treating Moderate to Severe Intrauterine Adhesions

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of hysteroscopic cold micro-scissors combined with an Intrauterine Bigatti Shaver (IBS) for the treatment of moderate to severe intrauterine adhesions (IUA), compared with hysteroscopic adhesiolysis using cold micro-scissors alone. Methods This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial enrolled women aged 18–45 years with moderate to severe IUA (AFS score ≥ 5) between January 2023 and June 2025.A total of 133 participants were randomized 1:1 to a Combined Group receiving cold micro-scissors plus a tissue removal IBS (n = 68) or a Control Group receiving cold micro-scissors alone for adhesiolysis (n = 65). All patients received standardized postoperative balloon stenting and sequential estrogen–progestin therapy. The primary endpoint was change in AFS score from baseline to 3 months assessed by blinded hysteroscopists. Secondary outcomes included operative time, blood loss, cavity morphology restoration, menstrual improvement, adhesion recurrence at 6 months, complications, patient satisfaction, and pregnancy outcomes up to 12 months among those desiring fertility. Results All randomized patients completed follow-up. At 3 months, the Combined Group achieved greater AFS score improvement than the Control Group (5.49 ± 1.54 vs 3.91 ± 1.63; P < 0.001; Cohen’s d = 1.00). Operation time was slightly longer in the Combined Group (38.7 ± 10.1 vs 34.8 ± 10.2 min; P = 0.007), while blood loss was significantly lower (median 10.2 vs 22.6 mL; P < 0.001). Menstrual improvement was higher in the Combined Group (90.2% vs 64.8%; P = 0.002), and normal uterine cavity morphology was more frequent (70.6% vs 46.2%; P = 0.034). Overall complications (7.4% vs 29.2%; P = 0.001) and adhesion recurrence at 6 months (7.4% vs 26.2%; P = 0.007) were reduced in the Combined Group. Patient satisfaction was higher (8.0 ± 1.0 vs 7.3 ± 1.2; P < 0.001). Among participants with fertility desire, pregnancy rates at 12 months were 49.0% vs 30.6% (P = 0.099). Conclusions Hysteroscopic micro-scissors combined with an IBS provides superior short-term anatomic restoration and symptom improvement with a lower complication and recurrence profile compared with micro-scissors alone in moderate to severe IUA, with a favorable trend toward improved pregnancy outcomes. These findings support broader adoption and multicenter validation of this endometrium-preserving approach.

Article activity feed