Using intervention mapping to adapt a visual-aided adolescent nutrition intervention from peri-urban Burkina Faso and operationalize implementation strategies in rural Uganda

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), including rural Uganda, commonly experience low nutrition literacy and poor diet quality, increasing their risk of malnutrition and diet-related non-communicable diseases. Most nutrition education interventions originate from high-income or school-based contexts, limiting relevance for rural and out-of-school AYAs. Context-specific, community-anchored interventions, and guidance on how to implement them within existing health systems ‒ remain scarce. We therefore used Intervention Mapping (IM) to support a systematic South–South participatory adaptation of a visual-aided adolescent nutrition intervention from peri-urban Burkina Faso and to operationalize implementation strategies for household-level delivery in rural Uganda. Adaptation process and implementation strategies: We applied the iterative six-step IM protocol, grounded in the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) and Social Cognitive Theory (SCT). A multi-stakeholder planning group comprising AYAs, parents, community health workers (CHWs), Government officials, and technical experts co-produced adaptations across six IM-aligned co-design workshops. A mixed-methods, SEM-guided needs assessment identified nutrition literacy, parental influence, receptiveness to CHW advice, food-related myths, and limited access to diverse foods as priority determinants of AYAs’ diet quality. Behavioural and environmental outcomes were specified, SCT-informed behaviour change methods were mapped, and translated into discrete, CHW-led implementation strategies, including training, use of visual aids, standard operating procedures–guided household visits, demonstration-based counselling, and supervision to support fidelity. Key adaptations included redesigning visual materials for low-literacy audiences, revising content to rural dietary realities, and embedding delivery within Uganda’s nationally institutionalized CHW platform. Nine visual-aided thematic flyers were produced, piloted, and refined. The process generated a rural Uganda–specific logic model of the problem, theory of change, a fully adapted intervention package, and operationalized implementation strategies for monthly CHW household delivery. Implications for implementation practice: By operationalizing implementation strategies alongside intervention adaptation, this study provides an actionable template for localizing visual-aided behaviour-change interventions within community health systems serving underserved AYAs in rural SSA, strengthening implementation readiness, fidelity, and scalability. Conclusion: A randomized controlled trial with an embedded process evaluation is underway. If effective, the operationalized CHW-led implementation strategies could support scale-up across rural Uganda and comparable SSA settings to improve AYAs’ nutrition literacy and diet quality. Trial registration: PACTR202501305580883

Article activity feed