Bilateral vs Unilateral Chronic Rhinosinusitis in HIV: Distinct Phenotypes from a Surgical Cohort

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background The European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS) 2020 classification for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) lacks validation in people living with HIV (PLWH), a population with a high burden of sinonasal disease. This study aimed to phenotype surgical HIV-associated CRS and compare bilateral versus unilateral disease. Methods This single-center, population-based cohort study included 60 consecutive patients with HIV-associated CRS requiring endoscopic sinus surgery between January 2020 and June 2025 at Beijing You’an Hospital, a national designated center where nearly all HIV-associated CRS surgical cases have been managed in China. Demographic, clinical, laboratory (including eosinophil/neutrophil counts), and radiological (Lund-Mackay score, E/M ratio) factors were analyzed. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression identified associations with bilateral CRS. Results The cohort comprised 60 PLWH (median age 36.0 years; 95.0% male), with bilateral CRS being predominant (78.3%). Univariate analysis revealed significant differences between bilateral and unilateral CRS in eosinophil parameters (both count and percentage: p < 0.001), neutrophil percentage (p = 0.018), Lund-Mackay CT scores (p = 0.007), and the ethmoid-to-maxillary sinus ratio (p = 0.037). On multivariable analysis, bilateral disease remained independently associated with a higher Lund-Mackay CT score (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.02–2.51, p = 0.043) and an elevated blood eosinophil percentage (aOR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.01–5.14, p = 0.049). Conclusions In PLWH, bilateral CRS is the dominant phenotype. Its association with radiographic severity and a type 2 inflammatory marker supports the use of the EPOS 2020 anatomic classification in this population.

Article activity feed