mTORC-Driven Immunogenomic Reprogramming Shapes Prognosis and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities in Unfavorable Histology Wilms Tumor

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Unfavorable Histology Wilms Tumor (UFH-WT) is a high-risk pediatric renal malignancy with poor prognosis, and the mTORC pathway's role in its heterogeneity, immune remodeling, and therapeutic vulnerability remains unclear, restricting its clinical application as a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target. Integrative multiomics analysis of transcriptomic, genomic, and clinical data was performed on three UFH-WT cohorts (TARGET-WT, GSE4530, GSE66405). Unsupervised clustering was used to identify mTORC-related subtypes; machine learning was applied to construct an mTORC-driven gene signature. The associations between mTORC activity and immune infiltration, genomic instability were analyzed, and drug sensitivity was predicted. Subtypes and prognosis: Two mTORC subtypes were identified. The mTORC-high subtype had inferior 5-year overall survival (OS) (42.3% vs. 68.7%, P = 0.044) and more prominent adverse genetic features (TP53 mutation: 38.7% vs. 19.4%; 1q gain: 45.2% vs. 25.8%, P < 0.05). Gene signature and prognostic model: A 4-gene signature (BTG2, LHX1, PKIA, RGS7) was constructed, which effectively stratified patients (5-year OS AUC: 0.632 [TARGET-WT], 0.589 [GSE4530], 0.618 [GSE66405]) and outperformed clinical variables. A nomogram integrating this signature and clinical parameters improved prognostic evaluation (2-year AUC = 0.705). Mechanistic associations: mTORC hyperactivation upregulated oncogenic pathways (nucleocytoplasmic transport, chromatin remodeling), suppressed proinflammatory signaling (TNF, NF-κB), reshaped the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (increased monocyte infiltration, decreased dendritic cells, upregulated PD-L1/CTLA-4), and increased tumor mutation burden (TMB: 3.2 vs. 1.8 mut/Mb, P = 0.003). Drug sensitivity: High-risk tumors were more sensitive to mTOR inhibitors (e.g., AZD8055, IC 50  = 0.42 µM vs. 0.71 µM), DNA damage modulators, and microtubule agents. mTORC signaling drives UFH-WT aggressiveness through immune evasion and genomic instability. The 4-gene signature and integrated nomogram enable risk stratification of UFH-WT, and the identified therapeutic vulnerabilities provide guidance for precision therapy.

Article activity feed