Analysis of implementation status and influencing factors of Standard Infection Control Methods for dental environmental surfaces by Dental Hygienists in Korea: a questionnaire-based study
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background Given reports that the Coronavirus Disease 2019 can survive on environmental surfaces for a period, public attention to surface disinfection has increased. However, only a few studies have investigated the current status of standard infection control practices for environmental surfaces. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the implementation status of standard infection control methods for dental environmental surfaces among Korean dental hygienists and to analyze the factors influencing these practices. Methods A survey was conducted to investigate surface infection control methods in dental office environments. A questionnaire, consisting of general characteristics and infection control methods stratified by environmental surfaces, was distributed to dental hygienists. Overall, 190 dental hygienists responded to the survey; responses from eight participants with incomplete data were excluded, and the remaining 182 responses were analyzed using SPSS software. Results The surfaces with the highest implementation rate of standard infection control methods were the bracket table (20.9%), followed by the light-curing unit head (18.1%). In contrast, drawer handles (0.5%) and windows (0.5%) had the lowest implementation rates. The odds of implementing standard infection control methods were 86.9 times higher for dental hygienists treating 40 or more patients daily compared with those treating 19 or fewer patients. In addition, the odds of implementing standard infection control methods were approximately 3 times higher when an infection control practitioner was present than when absent. Conclusion Based on a thorough understanding of dental institutions and accumulated evidence, our findings highlight the need to improve standard infection control methods for efficient implementation, and offer strategies to increase their implementation.