Modifiable Factors Driving Medical Students’ Choice of Anesthesiology: A Multicenter Group Concept Mapping Study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Anesthesiology faces global recruitment challenges. The final year of medical school strongly shapes students’ specialty preferences, yet most existing evidence comes from single-center cross-sectional studies, limiting generalizability. A clearer understanding of influential factors is essential to inform targeted recruitment and training strategies. Methods: We conducted a multicenter observational study using Group Concept Mapping (GCM), a mixed-methods approach combining qualitative brainstorming with quantitative sorting, clustering, and rating analysis. Six German medical schools participated between September 2024 and February 2025. Final-year medical students (N = 87) generated statements during brainstorming; 24 students sorted and 39 rated the statements on a five-point relevance scale. The primary outcome was the identification and prioritization of factors influencing anesthesiology career choice, measured through thematic clusters and their mean importance ratings. Results: Eight clusters emerged from multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis (stress = 0.208). Team culture and discipline-specific interest were rated highest, followed by mentoring. Work–life balance ranked second-lowest. Usable data sets from 24 participants were included in the sorting analysis, a number considered sufficient for robust and interpretable concept maps in this methodology. The majority of influential factors are amenable to improvement through departmental culture and educational design. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that there are well-modifiable factors that anesthesiology departments can leverage to attract students. Among these, experiences of a supportive team culture and engaging clinical learning opportunities play a decisive role, outweighing lifestyle considerations in our study. By situating these findings within a global perspective, we identify strategies that educators and policy makers worldwide can apply to strengthen recruitment into anesthesiology.

Article activity feed