Short-term efficacy and safety of hemodialysis using super high-flux dialyzers compared with online hemodiafiltration: a cross-sectional study in Vietnam

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) enhances removal of middle-molecule uremic toxins but requires ultrapure water systems and specialized equipment, limiting uptake in many low- and middle-income countries. Super high-flux (SHF) dialyzers have been proposed as a pragmatic alternative to improve permeability and remove larger solutes using standard hemodialysis machines, yet no evaluation has been conducted in Vietnam. Our study aimed to compare the short-term efficacy and safety of HD using SHF dialyzers (SHF-HD) with post-dilution OL-HDF in a real-world Vietnamese tertiary center. Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 30 patients receiving maintenance dialysis at People’s Hospital 115 (Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam). Among those, fifteen patients received SHF-HD and fifteen received OL-HDF. A single 240-minute session was examined per patient. Blood samples were drawn pre- and post-dialysis to measure urea, β₂-microglobulin, parathyroid hormone, interleukin-6, leptin, albumin, and C-reactive protein concentration. Reduction ratios for middle molecules were hematocrit-corrected. Results: Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and biochemical parameters were comparable between groups. Both pre- and post-dialysis concentrations of solutes showed no significant differences between modalities. Reduction ratios of middle-molecule toxins showed no significant differences between SHF-HD and OL-HDF, including β₂-microglobulin (65.05% vs. 68.20%, p  = 0.561), parathyroid hormone (66.32% vs. 63.57%, p  = 0.803), interleukin-6 (23.62% vs. 21.20%, p  = 0.213), and leptin (41.08% vs. 36.36%, p  = 0.678). Albumin changes were minimal in both groups (− 0.40 ± 0.68 vs. −0.44 ± 1.32 g/L, p  = 0.911), and C-reactive protein remained stable. Across all 30 treatment sessions, no intradialytic complications were observed. Conclusions: In this first Vietnamese evaluation, SHF-HD provided short-term removal of middle-molecule solutes comparable to OL-HDF, with minimal albumin loss, stable inflammatory markers, and no adverse events. Larger longitudinal studies are warranted to determine whether the observed biochemical equivalence translates into long-term clinical benefits.

Article activity feed