Prospective Observational Study of Cadonilimab in Cervical Cancer: Real-World Efficacy, Safety, and Predictive Biomarkers
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Objective Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a promising treatment option for cervical cancer in clinical trials. This interim analysis of an ongoing prospective cohort study evaluates the real-world efficacy of cadonilimab, a bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4, and identifies early prognostic biomarkers in cervical cancer patients. Methods This preliminary report analyzes the first 51 consecutive patients from a protocol-driven observational cohort initiating cadonilimab (≥2 cycles) between June 2022 and August 2025. Standardized prospective data collection included clinicopathological variables, peripheral blood biomarkers, and protocol-defined tumor assessments (RECIST v1.1 every 6 weeks). Interim efficacy endpoints (objective response rate [ORR], disease control rate [DCR], 3-month progression-free survival [PFS] rate) and safety (CTCAE v5.0) were evaluated, with multivariate analyses to identify predictive factors. Interim Results At the data cutoff date (August 2025), the cohort demonstrated an ORR of 72.5% and a DCR of 90.2%. The 3-month PFS rate was 80.9% (95% CI: 69.7-93.8). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were not reached. Multivariable analysis revealed that squamous cell carcinoma histology and baseline IL-6 levels ≤5.4 pg/mL (p<0.05) were significantly associated with higher ORR. Most adverse events (AEs) were manageable, with hematologic toxicities (e.g., anemia, leukopenia) being the most frequently observed. Notably, patients with baseline complement C3 levels <0.90 g/L exhibited a higher incidence of AEs. Conclusions This interim analysis suggests cadonilimab's favorable benefit-risk profile in cervical cancer, with early biomarker trends requiring validation in the final cohort. Continued follow-up will clarify long-term outcomes and biomarker robustness.