Reducing the environmental impact of peat use in gardening: a behavioural science approach

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Peat extraction for horticulture contributes to carbon emissions and biodiversity loss, yet peat remains widely used in gardening. Transitioning to peat-free gardening requires understanding factors influencing consumers’ behaviours. We conducted a cross-sectional, mixed-methods survey of 954 UK gardeners, applying the COM-B model (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation – Behaviour) to identify barriers/enablers to purchasing peat-free compost and peat-free plants. For using peat-free compost, regression analyses identified cost (Physical Opportunity) and off-putting texture/smell of peat-free compost (Automatic Motivation) as barriers, while availability (Physical Opportunity), recommendations from trusted organisations (Social Opportunity) and prioritising 'peat-free' labels (Reflective Motivation) were enablers. Awareness of peat-free plants was low, linked to poor labelling (Physical Opportunity). Enablers included knowing where to purchase (Psychological Capability), availability (Physical Opportunity), and valuing peat-free plants (Reflective Motivation). Qualitative findings highlighted inconsistent peat-free compost quality and adapting care practices. Suggested interventions include clearer labelling, improved quality control and knowledge transfer on peat-free plant care.

Article activity feed