Electronic Health Record Developer Adherence to Federal AI Risk Transparency Requirements

  1. Nidhi Manikkoth
  2. Ngan Vo
  3. Jessica Handley
  4. Josh Biro
  5. Jordan Everson
  6. Raj M. Ratwani
  7. Kristen Miller
Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

We evaluated electronic health record developer compliance with federal transparency requirements for AI-enabled predictive decision support interventions. Developers are required to publicly report on risk analysis, mitigation, governance, and on eight other attributes. Across 35 developers, reporting was inconsistent and often incomplete, with substantial variation in structure and detail, yet all developers were certified as meeting the requirements. Results suggest a need for standardized reporting and more rigorous certification review.

Article activity feed

  1. Version published to 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8255773/v1 on Research Square