Analytical Hierarchical Process for Modelling Malaria Vulnerability Index Among Local Government Areas in Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background Persistent malaria transmission in Africa underscores the need for spatially explicit tools that identify highly endemic areas for targeted control. Although multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) offers a structured approach, its application has been limited by outdated environmental inputs and inconsistent factor aggregation methods. This study developed an ecology-informed Malaria Vulnerability Index (MVI) for Bayelsa State, Nigeria, using up-to-date, open-source geospatial datasets and a transparent weighting framework. Methods Thirteen environmental predictors were sourced from OpenStreetMap, Google Earth Engine, WorldPop, and GRID3. Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), a 13×13 pairwise comparison matrix was constructed and solved using the eigenvalue method to derive criterion weights. Weighted predictors were combined to generate the MVI, which was overlaid with gridded population data to quantify population exposure. Associations between population counts across low, medium, and high vulnerability zones and reported malaria cases were assessed using correlation analysis. Results The highest-priority criteria were distance to streams, distance to wetlands, precipitation, topographic wetness index, and land surface temperature. Medium vulnerability dominated the landscape (77.1%), followed by low (17.2%) and high (5.7%) vulnerability. High-vulnerability areas were concentrated in riverine LGAs, particularly Southern Ijaw (40.25%), Brass (19.30%), Ekeremor (17.36%), and Sagbama (15.89%). Population exposure reflected these patterns: 3.63% of residents lived in high-vulnerability zones, 74.66% in medium, and 21.70% in low zones. Population in low-vulnerability areas showed a strong correlation with reported malaria cases (r = 0.914), while total population also correlated with cases (r = 0.719). Conclusion Malaria vulnerability in Bayelsa State is primarily driven by hydrological and hydroclimatic conditions, especially proximity to streams and wetlands, rainfall, and microtopographic wetness. The AHP-based MCDA framework provides a rigorous and transparent approach for integrating environmental factors, supporting hydrology-focused targeting of malaria surveillance and vector control, and enabling reproducible MVI mapping using open-source geospatial data.