Sex Differences in Cluster Headache: Insights from the Chinese Cluster Headache Register Individual Study (CHRIS)

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Sex differences in the clinical characteristics of cluster headache (CH) remain controversial in both Eastern and Western studies, and such differences have not been thoroughly investigated among Chinese patients. Methods This large-scale, multicenter cohort study included 1,206 patients from 31 provinces across China diagnosed with CH between May 2021 and December 2024, and was conducted within the framework of the Chinese Cluster Headache Register Individual Study. Demographic and clinical data were systematically collected from each participant using an electronic structured questionnaire, and compared all variables between sexes. Results In total, 1,206 patients were enrolled, with a female-to-male ratio of 1:3.94. Demographic analysis showed that women had an earlier mean age of onset, higher educational attainment, and fewer unhealthy lifestyle factors compared with men. Women were also more likely to have comorbid migraine (28.28% vs. 15.90%, P < 0.001) and psychological conditions such as anxiety and depression, and to use oral rizatriptan for acute treatment (27.78% vs. 15.80%, P < 0.001). With respect to cranial autonomic symptoms (CASs), women experienced eyelid edema (18.85% vs. 12.47%, P = 0.010) and ptosis (56.97% vs. 49.90%, P = 0.048) more frequently, and reported migraine-associated symptoms more often. Conversely, men more commonly presented with conjunctival hyperemia (56.03% vs. 38.52%, P < 0.001), rhinorrhea (47.92% vs. 38.93%, P = 0.012), and facial sweating (38.15% vs. 30.74%, P = 0.032). Women had significantly higher frequencies of attacks during the early morning hours (2:00–8:00), whereas men experienced significantly more attacks during midday (10:00–14:00) and evening (16:00–20:00). Conclusion This study provides the first comprehensive analysis of multidimensional sex differences in Chinese patients with CH, encompassing social characteristics, clinical phenotypes, psychological burden, and circadian attack distribution. These findings offer valuable evidence for developing precision medicine approaches and sex-specific clinical management strategies for CH.

Article activity feed