Thermo-hygrometric aging increases marginal gap of lithium disilicate and leucite-reinforced CAD/CAM veneers but not resin nano-ceramic: an in-vitro comparative study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Backgound: Marginal adaptation is a critical determinant of veneer longevity; thermo‑hygrometric artificial accelerated aging (AAA) may alter luting interfaces and material‑specific deformations. Methods: Using the same 30‑specimen dataset as Article 1, vertical marginal gap (µm) was measured by USB microscope and image analysis before and after 300 h AAA (UV‑B 280–320 nm; 4 h UV at 50 °C + 4 h condensation cycles). Results: Non‑aged vs aged mean gaps (µm) were Lava Ultimate 62.0±22.6→85.3±24.1 (ns), IPS e.max CAD 52.9±17.7→84.4±5.4 (p=0.009), and IPS Empress CAD 61.6±7.2→89.4±12.3 (p=0.009). Between‑materials differences were not significant at either timepoint. Conclusions: AAA significantly widened marginal gaps for glass‑ceramics but not for the resin nano‑ceramic, consistent with polymer‑matrix resilience. All gaps remained within common clinical acceptability ranges (≈40–120 µm) in this setup.

Article activity feed