Psychosocial Impact of Acne Among Medical and Allied Health Undergraduates in Sri Lanka: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Validated Tools

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Acne vulgaris is associated with substantial psychosocial effects, including impaired socioemotional well-being among young adults. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of acne and to explore the relationships and predictors of acne-related quality of life, psychological distress, and self-esteem among medical and allied health undergraduates at the University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in 2025 among undergraduates aged 18–28 years from three degree programmes: Medicine (MBBS), Speech and Hearing Sciences (SHS) and Occupational Therapy (OT). The participants were recruited via convenience sampling via a self-administered online questionnaire with three validated psychometric tools: The Acne Quality of Life Questionnaire (Acne-QoL), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) and the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21). Data analysis was performed in SPSS v22, employing descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, linear regression and Pearson correlation. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05 for chi-square and regression analyses, and a more stringent significance level of p ≤ 0.001 was used for correlation analyses. Results: Among 480 respondents (361 females, 119 males), acne incidence was significantly greater in females (87.0%) than in males (70.6%) (p < 0.05). After 109 responses were excluded on the basis of predefined criteria, the final sample included 371 participants (79% female), with a mean age of 23.9 years. The Pearson correlation analysis revealed very strong positive correlations among the four Acne-QoL domains-acne symptoms, self-perception, role emotional, and role social-with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.812 to 0.950 (all p < 0.001), with the strongest correlation being between self-perception and role emotional (r = 0.950, p < 0.001). Each acne-QoL domain demonstrated a moderate positive correlation with overall self-esteem (r = 0.424 to 0.519, all p < 0.001), with the role social domain correlating most strongly with self-esteem (r = 0.519, p < 0.001). Significant negative correlations were found between all four Acne-QoL domains and the following psychological distress measures: anxiety, depression, and stress (p < 0.001). Linear regression revealed that the acne symptoms domain was a positive and significant predictor of self-esteem (B = 0.154, β = 0.221, p = 0.006), whereas the role social domain was the strongest positive predictor (B = 0.420, β = 0.615, p < 0.001). Conversely, the role emotional domain negatively predicted self-esteem (B = -0.176, β = -0.314, p = 0.030). The acne symptoms domain is a significant negative predictor of depression (B = -0.139, β = 0.209, p = 0.017). Similarly, the role social domain also significantly negatively predicts depression (B = -0.218, β = -0.333, p = 0.013). For anxiety, the acne symptoms domain score was also a significant negative predictor (B = -0.204, β = -0.320, p < 0.001). For stress, the acne symptoms domain also showed a significant negative association (B = -0.163, β = -0.259, p = 0.004). Gender differences emerged in the depression and stress models: females reported lower depression and stress scores related to social roles but higher scores related to emotional roles (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: This study highlights the significant psychosocial impact of acne among medical and allied health undergraduates, underscoring the importance of holistic care that addresses both dermatological and mental health needs.

Article activity feed