Dentoalveolar Markers in A Group of Turkish Population with Different Anteroposterior Relationships: A CBCT Retrospective Study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective: To assess collum angle and alveolar bone thickness across different anteroposterior incisor relationships using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and to analyze the correlations between these morphological parameters. Materials and Methods: This retrospective CBCT study included 200 Turkish patients (12–37 years) categorized according to the British Standards Institution (BSI) incisor classification: Class I, Class II/1, Class II/2, and Class III. Collum angle and buccal, palatal, and lingual alveolar bone thicknesses were measured on maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth and premolars at 5 mm apical to the CEJ using standardized sagittal slices. Results: Collum angle varied significantly among malocclusion groups, with the greatest values observed in Class II/2 and Class III individuals. Mandibular teeth consistently exhibited positive collum angles, whereas maxillary teeth showed class-dependent variation. Buccal bone thickness was substantially reduced in Class III mandibular incisors and canines, while Class II/2 subjects presented increased palatal thickness in selected maxillary teeth. Correlation analysis revealed tooth- and class-specific associations, including a moderate negative correlation between collum angle and buccal thickness in Class II/2 maxillary central incisors, and a strong positive correlation with lingual thickness in Class III mandibular lateral incisors. Conclusion: Collum angle and alveolar bone thickness exhibit distinct, class-dependent morphological patterns that may restrict the biomechanical limits of orthodontic tooth movement. The pronounced root inclinations and reduced alveolar support in Class II/2 and Class III patients underscore the need for detailed CBCT evaluation to prevent periodontal complications during treatment.

Article activity feed