Predictive Performance and Clinical Application of PRS-15 for Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Chinese Orthopedic Patients: A Multicenter Prospective Case-Control Study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) is influenced by clinical and genetic factors. The Caprini score is widely used but does not account for population-specific genetic susceptibility in Chinese individuals. We previously developed a Chinese-specific 15-variant polygenic risk score (PRS-15) for VTE; however, its clinical performance and added value when combined with the Caprini score remain unclear. Methods We conducted a multicenter prospective case–control study at 18 hospitals in China (February 2023–March 2025), enrolling 1,013 postoperative VTE cases and 1,025 controls. Blood samples were genotyped for PRS-15, and clinical variables and outcomes were analyzed. Discrimination and calibration were assessed using AUC and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test. Two integrated models were constructed: Model 1, PRS-15T (tertiles: high/intermediate/low) plus Caprini; and Model 2, PRS-15B (binary: high/low) plus Caprini. K-means clustering identified optimal PRS-15 thresholds and integration strategies. Model performance was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, and net reclassification improvement (NRI), with internal validation by bootstrap resampling. Results The PRS-15 model achieved an AUC of 0.702 (95% CI, 0.680–0.725; P < 0.001). For ternary classification (PRS-15T), the optimal thresholds were 2.230 and 1.730, while the optimal threshold for binary classification (PRS-15B) was 2.335. The sensitivities of Model 1 and Model 2 were 93.88% and 90.52%, respectively, both exceeding that of the Caprini score alone (87.36%). Model 2 demonstrated the highest specificity (33.85%), outperforming Model 1 (26.73%) and the Caprini score (21.37%), and achieved an NRI of 15.65%. Conclusion PRS-15 accurately discriminated VTE cases from controls and remained robust across age and sex subgroups. Adding PRS-15 to the Caprini score significantly improved risk assessment accuracy, supporting its clinical use for VTE risk evaluation in Chinese orthopedic surgical patients.

Article activity feed