Bioequivalence of C-reactive protein in fingerprick blood and serum measured using the point-of-care LumiraDx test for tuberculosis diagnosis in exposed contacts

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: C-reactive protein (CRP) is recommended to screen people living with HIV (PLWH) for tuberculosis (TB). LumiraDxis a portable platform that uses fingerprick blood. How CRP compares in fingerprick blood and serum is unknown. Methods: CRP was measured in 1034 consecutively recruited contacts of people with TB using fresh fingerprick blood (LumiraDx at point-of-care) and stored (-80°C) serum [LumiraDx and cobas C‑Reactive Protein (Latex) High Sensitive (CRPHS) in laboratories]. Agreement was assessed using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), Passing-Bablok (PB) regression, and Bland-Altman (BA) plots. Sensitivity and specificity for TB were evaluated in 156 contacts with microbiological reference standard information. Results: Strong agreement [CCC=0.85, PB slope -0.27 (95% confidence interval -0.82, 0.2), BA mean difference 1 (-1, 3)] was observed between LumiraDx on fingerprick blood and serum. Similar agreement occurred for serum CRPHS vs. LumiraDx on serum [0.79; 1.1 (-1.1, 2.3); 11 (9, 14)] or fingerprick blood [0.75; 1.3 (-0.6, 2.5); 10 (8, 13)]. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs)were 0.747 (0.595, 0.899) for fingerprick LumiraDx, 0.761 (0.628, 0.893) for serum LumiraDx and 0.775 (0.636, 0.914) for serum CRPHS. At >5 mg/L, all tests showed identical sensitivity [77%(70, 83)]. Specificities were 60% (53, 68), 64% (57, 72) and 50% (43, 58), respectively. Serum storage duration did not affect performance. Conclusions: LumiraDx CRP readouts on fingerprick blood and serum correlate closely. Stored serum can be used for LumiraDx CRP measurement. High sensitivity methods increase the proportion of people who screen false-positive. Funding: This project is part of the EDCTP2 programme supported by the European Union and received funding under grant agreement number RIA2018D-2509.

Article activity feed