T-cell responses are insufficient to generate protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Neutralizing antibodies are established correlates of protection against SARS-CoV-2, yet T-cell responses are also thought to contribute substantially to limiting disease severity and enhancing durability of protection. To examine whether cellular immunity alone can confer protection, we engineered DNA vaccines encoding modified Spike proteins, including C-terminal truncation (SARS-CoV-2-ΔC, ΔC) and cleavage-site–deleted, linker-inserted (SARS-CoV-2-Linker-ΔT, Linker-ΔT) variants, with or without genetic fusion to MIP3α, which has been shown to enhance targeting of antigen-presenting cells (APC) and preferentially induce T-cell responses. In BALB/c mice, ΔC constructs induced non-neutralizing Spike- and RBD-binding antibodies across variants, as well as robust CD4 + and CD8 + T cell responses, whereas Linker-ΔT elicited strong Th1-skewed cellular immunity in the absence of humoral responses. In K18-hACE2 mice antibody neutralizing activity was not detected by any of the vaccines, and none conferred protection following lethal virus challenge, despite robust specific T-cell cytokine responses. These results support vaccine designs incorporating chemokine fusion to enhance T-cell priming, but cellular responses alone are insufficient for SARS-CoV-2 protection. Integrating such APC-targeting strategies with structural modifications that preserve pre-fusion neutralizing epitopes may be worthwhile.

Article activity feed