Polish Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Lung Transplant Quality of Life (LT-QoL) Questionnaire

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Survival after lung transplantation has improved, increasing the need for disease-specific assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Lung Transplant Quality of Life (LT-QoL) Questionnaire is a transplant-specific patient-reported outcome measure, but no Polish version has been available. This study aimed to translate the LT-QoL into Polish and evaluate its psychometric properties. Methods The LT-QoL was translated using a forward-backward procedure with sworn translators and review by a multidisciplinary team and the original authors. In a cross-sectional study, 70 adult lung transplant recipients from a single tertiary center completed the Polish LT-QoL, SF-36, EQ-5D-5L (EQ Index Value, EQ-VAS), St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Analyses covered internal consistency, inter-subscale correlations, convergent and divergent validity, known-groups comparisons as well as hierarchical and LASSO regression predicting SF-36 global QoL. Results Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.44 to 0.97, with most LT-QoL domains at or above 0.70. The three second-order composites, Pulmonary Symptoms, GI Symptoms, and Anxiety/Depression, showed good reliability; the stand-alone two-item General Quality of Life scale also showed high reliability. Shortness of Breath (α = 0.44) and Neuromuscular Symptoms (α = 0.67) were weaker but acceptable for descriptive use. Correlations among subscales supported the intended multidimensional structure. Respiratory LT-QoL domains correlated moderately to strongly with SGRQ, emotional domains with HADS, and global/physical domains with SF-36 QoL and EQ-5D-5L, while GI and sexual domains showed weaker associations with respiratory measures. Known-groups analyses showed expected differences by dyspnea, health distress, sex and time since transplantation. LT-QoL domains explained additional variance in QoL, health status and distress beyond age, sex and time since transplant. The LASSO model predicting SF-36 QoL performed well (R² = 0.57) and highlighted Worry About Future Health, Shortness of Breath, General Quality of Life, Anxiety/Depression, Pulmonary Symptoms and Cognitive Limitations as key predictors. Conclusions The Polish LT-QoL shows satisfactory reliability and construct validity and appears suitable for use in clinical practice and research, with larger multicenter and longitudinal studies warranted.

Article activity feed