Immune-Metabolic Dysregulation and Suicide Risk in Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder: A Cross- Sectional Study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Biomarkers distinguishing suicidal from non-suicidal adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD) remain elusive. This study investigated immune-metabolic dysregulation and its predictive utility for suicide attempt (SA) risk in medication-naïve adolescents. Methods: A case-control study compared 168 non-suicidal MDD adolescents with 96 MDD+SA adolescents (recent SA). Peripheral biomarkers included immune cell ratios (neutrophil/HDL [NHR], monocyte/HDL [MHR], lymphocyte/HDL [LHR]), metabolic markers (triglycerides, HDL-C, total protein (TP)), and hematological indices. Analyses employed group comparisons (t-tests/Mann-Whitney U), Spearman correlations, binary logistic regression, and ROC analysis. Results: The groups were well-matched demographically and for clinical severity. After adjusting for covariates, the MDD+SA group exhibited significant immune-metabolic dysregulation, including granulocyte hyperactivity, elevated inflammatory ratios, profound HDL-C depletion, hypertriglyceridemia, and reduced total protein (all key findings with adjusted p < 0.05). A post-hoc False Discovery Rate analysis confirmed the robustness of the core lipid findings. Binary logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, and BMI, identified triglycerides (adjusted OR=2.17 per mmol/L) and total protein (adjusted OR=0.93 per g/L decrease) as independent predictors of SA. A model combining triglycerides and total protein significantly outperformed individual biomarkers in ROC analysis (AUC=0.74, 95% CI: 0.68-0.80). Conclusions: Convergent lipid-protein dysregulation represents a novel pathway for adolescent SA risk, identifiable as a significant shift within the normal laboratory range. A simple two-biomarker panel shows promise for risk stratification but requires future validation. These findings highlight metabolic dysfunction as a potential target for preventive strategies, though they do not yet constitute evidence for specific clinical interventions.

Article activity feed