Research on the Morphology and Injury Mechanism of Pilon Fractures

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

This study investigates the link between injury mechanisms and the morphology of high-energy Pilon fractures to support accurate clinical diagnosis and treatment. It includes 192 patients from Lianyungang Second People's Hospital (2010–2024), categorized into five groups based on trauma history and imaging: dorsiflexion, varus, valgus, plantarflexion, and neutral. Two experienced orthopedic surgeons independently assessed X-rays, CT scans, and 3D reconstructions, noting fibular fracture details, tibial fragment distribution, fracture angle, and Topliss classification. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 25.0, with chi-square or Fisher's exact tests (P < 0.05 for significance). The study identified distinct fracture patterns based on injury mechanisms (P < 0.05): Dorsiflexion injuries often had "medial + anterolateral + Die-punch" fragments (45%), fracture angles > 90° (65%), and coronal Y-type fractures (25%). Varus injuries typically presented "anterolateral + posterolateral + medial + Die-punch" fragments (32.5%) and sagittal split fractures (40%). Valgus injuries were associated with comminuted fibular fractures (64.3%) and tibial coronal V/Y-type fractures (35.7%). Plantarflexion injuries frequently involved posterolateral fragments (61.5%) and fracture angles > 90° (80.8%). Neutral injuries were marked by complex comminuted fractures, with 33.7% showing Die-punch collapse. This study establishes a significant correlation between the morphology of high-energy Pilon fractures and their injury mechanisms, suggesting that preoperative mechanism classification can enhance surgical strategies and minimize complications.

Article activity feed