Evaluation of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in a Group of Orthodontic Patients With Different Sagittal Skeletal Relationships

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background This study aimed to evaluate and compare the subjective sleep quality of Thai orthodontic patients classified into skeletal class I (Sk-I), class II (Sk-II), and class III (Sk-III) groups using the Thai-Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (Thai-PSQI). Methods A total of 93 orthodontic patients undergoing treatment were included in the study. Cephalometric analysis using Dolphin Imaging software classified participants into Sk-I, Sk-II, and Sk-III groups. Sleep quality was assessed using the Thai-PSQI. Data normality was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores among skeletal groups. Demographic characteristics and differences in sleep-related parameters (sex, age, and body mass index) between good and poor sleepers were analyzed using the Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test (α = 0.05). Results The Sk-II group had the highest PSQI scores, followed by the Sk-I and Sk-III groups (6.68 ± 3.39, 6.42 ± 2.71, and 6.26 ± 2.46, respectively), indicating poor quality across all groups. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in PSQI scores among the skeletal groups (p > 0.05). Similarly, the distribution of good and poor sleepers was not significantly different among the Sk-I, Sk-II, and Sk-III groups (p > 0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in sleep-related parameters between good and poor sleepers (p > 0.05). Conclusions Sleep quality is not influenced by sagittal skeletal patterns. Therefore, incorporating sleep quality assessments into orthodontic treatment planning may be beneficial.

Article activity feed