Comparative Study of Conventional Ohmic and Hybrid Ohmic-Vacuum Heating for White Mulberry Syrup Concentration: Bioactive Compound Retention, Energy Consumption, and Multi-objective Optimization

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

This study systematically compared conventional ohmic heating and hybrid ohmic-vacuum heating technologies for white mulberry syrup concentration, evaluating the interactive effects of voltage gradient (10–30 V/cm) and pressure (50–100 kPa) on bioactive compound retention, energy efficiency, and process optimization. Multi-objective optimization was performed using Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) to simultaneously maximize bioactive compounds while minimizing processing time and energy consumption. Results demonstrated that increasing voltage gradient from 10 to 30 V/cm reduced processing time by 75.3% at atmospheric pressure, though ohmic-vacuum conditions exhibited 81–295% longer processing times due to reduced electrical conductivity at lower temperatures. Total phenolic content decreased by 28–48% across all treatments, with best retention (33.1 mg GAE/100 mL) achieved at 50 kPa and 10 V/cm. Antioxidant capacity showed excellent preservation (62.13–86.12%), peaking at 86.12% under intermediate conditions (75 kPa, 20 V/cm). Total flavonoid content exhibited dramatic variability (60.22–171.20 mg CE/100 g), with maximum retention at 50 kPa and 10 V/cm, while 20 V/cm proved universally detrimental regardless of pressure. Counterintuitively, conventional ohmic heating demonstrated superior energy efficiency, with specific energy consumption 2.5-3.7-fold lower than hybrid ohmic-vacuum method. NSGA-II optimization identified the best conditions at 83.47 kPa and 26.82 V/cm, which yielded the following experimental responses: 30.85 mg GAE/100 mL for total phenol content, 84.73% for antioxidant capacity, 78.14 mg CE/100 g for total flavonoid content, 12.24 min for processing time, and 2.87 MJ/kg water for energy consumption.

Article activity feed