Sensitivity of the load-velocity relationship variables to discriminate the level of fatigue induced by multiple sets of the smith-machine squat exercise

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background The aim of the research was to examine the sensitivity of load-velocity (L-V) relationship parameters ( L 0 , v 0 , and A line (area under the L–V line; Aline =  L 0 × v 0 / 2) ) in detecting fatigue after different fatigue protocols as well as their correlation with changes in 1-repetition maximum (1RM). Methods After a familiarization and preliminary testing session which was used for 1RM smith-machine squat (SMS) determination and performing a set of repetition to failure with 70%1RM load, 28 resistance-trained men randomly performed three fatigue protocols. All fatigue protocols were carried out between two incremental loading tests, conducted at the beginning (pre-session) and end (post-session) of the training session. The characteristics of the fatigue protocols were as follows: (i) control protocol: no training, (ii) moderate-fatigue protocol: 5 sets of the SMS exercise at 70%1RM performing half the maximum possible number of repetitions, and (iii) high-fatigue protocol: 5 sets of the SMS exercise performed to failure against the 70%1RM. Results Post-session declines in 1RM ( p  < 0.001), L 0 ( p  = 0.001) and A line ( p  < 0.001) were the greatest after the high fatigue protocol, followed by the moderate fatigue protocol and finally the control protocol. Changes in v ₀ did not differentiate between the fatigue protocols ( p  = 0.325). The post-session percentage change in 1RM was significantly correlated with the percentage change in A line ( r  = 0.832) and L 0 ( r  = 0.764), but not with the percentage change in v 0 ( r = -0.012). Conclusions These results suggest that L-V relationship variables offer a highly sensitive and practical solution for fatigue monitoring. Trial registration: Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT07307963 (First posted: 19 December 2025; retrospectively registered).

Article activity feed