Exploring UCH-L1 and BDNF for Precision Diagnostics and Prognostic Evaluation: A Novel Way of Severity Stratification of Traumatic Brain Injury

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury remains a major global health concern, with current diagnostic tools often limited in sensitivity and prognostic accuracy. This study evaluated UCH-L1 and BDNF for their role in stratifying injury severity and predicting outcomes. A total of 310 participants were enrolled, including 250 TBI patients and 60 healthy controls. Functional outcomes were measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale. Serum UCH-L1 and BDNF levels were quantified within 72 hours post-injury using ELISA. UCH-L1 increased progressively with injury severity, while BDNF showed an inverse trend.UCH-L1 correlated negatively with GCS (ρ = − 0.95) and GOS (ρ = − 0.59), whereas BDNF correlated positively with GCS (ρ = 0.47) and GOS (ρ = 0.46). Non-survivors had significantly higher UCH-L1 and lower BDNF compared to survivors (p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed superiority of UCH-L1 (AUC = 0.92) against GCS (AUC = 0.84) and BDNF (AUC = 0.78), while the combined model (GCS + UCH-L1 + BDNF) achieved the best predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.95). Multivariate regression identified UCH-L1 as an independent predictor of mortality (OR = 3.07, p < 0.001). These findings suggest that UCH-L1 and BDNF act as complementary biomarkers that facilitate severity stratification and prognosis prediction in traumatic brain injury.

Article activity feed