Revisiting the INSPIRE trial: Antibody profiling reveals high prevalence of occult autoimmunity

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Rationale : The INSPIRE trial failed to demonstrate improved survival in participants labeled as Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) after treatment with IFN-gamma-1β. This outcome became the impetus to develop more personalized approaches to the diagnosis, classification, and management of pulmonary fibrosis. Objective : The present study was designed to assess autoantibody profiles in a randomly selected group of INSPIRE trial participants in order to better define IPF on a molecular diagnostic level and define subsets with potentially different underlying disease processes. Methods : We performed conventional, gel-based protein and RNA immunoprecipitation (IP) on 483 plasma specimens derived from patients enrolled in both the treatment and placebo arms of INSPIRE. Tandem immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry proteomics (IP-to-MS) of selected specimens was performed to confirm conventional IP interpretation and to identify unknown autoantigens. Results : Based on conventional IP approaches, approximately 30% of trial participants had evidence of autoimmune disease-specific autoantibodies and an additional ~ 10% had evidence of autoantibodies of unknown specificity. IP-to-MS revealed additional autoantigens, including Annexin 11. Conclusions : IP analyses demonstrated an unexpectedly high prevalence of autoantibodies potentially indicative of underlying connective tissue disease-associated ILD, underscoring the importance of classification schemes incorporating unbiased autoantibody profiling.Word count: 192

Article activity feed