Consensus on Assessments and Reassessment Frequency for Home-Based Therapeutic Exercise in Spinal Cord Injury: A Delphi Study.

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Study design: An electronic Delphi (e-Delphi) consensus study. Objectives To identify essential assessment items and define recommendations for reassessment frequency to guide prescription of home- and community-based exercise programmes for people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Settings: United Kingdom. Methods A three-round e-Delphi method was conducted with a multidisciplinary panel of 22 experts in SCI rehabilitation. Items were derived from national and international guidelines for assessments and rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Open-text suggestions were incorporated into subsequent rounds. Consensus was defined as ≥ 70% agreement, median ≥ 4, and interquartile range (IQR) ≤ 1. Results Twenty experts (90.9%) completed Round 1 and 15 (68.2%) completed all three rounds. Consensus was reached on 48 assessment items spanning demographics, injury characteristics, impairments, psychological factors, and complications. Consensus was reached on the need to assess safety-critical domains (pain, vital signs, tissue viability) every session, while neurological and cognitive measures were recommended only when significant changes occurred. Other domains, including activity-level assessments, showed less consistent agreement. Anticipated functional change was the main determinant of reassessment frequency. Conclusions This e-Delphi study provides consensus-based recommendations on assessment content and reassessment schedules for exercise programmes in SCI. The framework may support more consistent, safe, and individualised rehabilitation in community and home-based contexts.

Article activity feed