Environmental Health Risks in Residential Settings: A Systematic Review of Indoor Air Pollution, Domestic Chemical Exposure, and Global Representation Inequities
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Introduction Environmental health risks in homes are driven by indoor air pollution, contaminated dust/soil, and contaminated water, as well as the use of household chemicals, with unequal mitigation across different settings. Materials and Methods A PRISMA-guided Systematic Literature Review (SLR) synthesized 44 Scopus-indexed studies (Jan 2015–Mar 2025). We charted exposure types, research designs, populations, variables, and geography. Results Indoor air pollution was most frequent (25/44; 56.8%), followed by soil/dust (10/44; 22.7%), chemical exposure (4/44; 9.1%), water (3/44; 6.8%), and heat/climate stress (2/44; 4.5%). Studies were concentrated in Asia (68.2%) and Africa (15.9%); Latin America & the Caribbean, as well as Oceania, each accounted for 2.3%. Designs were dominated by experimental/field–lab studies (40.9%), with cohort/longitudinal studies being rare (4.5%). Populations most examined were urban residents (63.6%); vulnerable groups included children (22.7%), older adults (6.8%), and low-income families (6.8%). The most-analyzed variables were heavy metal concentration (25.0%) and air quality (22.7%). Conclusion The residential risk burden is primarily linked to the use of solid fuels, poor ventilation, and household chemical practices, with apparent geographic and methodological gaps. Priorities include clean-fuel transition, ventilation upgrades, targeted risk communication on chemicals, and broader community-based research—framed within the One Health framework to integrate health, environment, and social actions.