3D Virtual Models versus 2D Imaging in Preoperative Planning for Spinal En Bloc Resections: A Comparative Cohort Study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Purpose En bloc resection (EBR) of spinal tumours requires precise anatomical understanding for safe and complete excision. Conventional 2D imaging (CT/MRI) can limit spatial comprehension, particularly for less experienced surgeons. Patient-specific 3D virtual models (3DVMs) may enhance preoperative planning, but evidence in spinal oncology remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and clinical utility of 3DVMs using a novel quantitative Scale of Anatomical Distortion (SAD) and assess their integration into surgical workflows. Methods In a single-centre retrospective cohort, 31 patients undergoing spinal EBR (2019–2024) were included. 3DVMs were generated by fusing CT and MRI datasets using BrainLab Elements. Six spinal surgeons of varying experience assessed anatomical distortion using both 2D imaging and 3DVMs, with neuroradiologist-derived SAD scores as benchmarks. Accuracy, inter-rater reliability, scoring time, and tumour volume estimation were analysed. Surgeon perceptions were captured via an 11-item Likert questionnaire. Statistical analysis included Spearman correlation, Wilcoxon tests, and Cohen’s kappa. Results 3DVMs accurately represented tumour-related anatomical distortion (ρ = 0.771, p < 0.0001), with moderate agreement across neural, bony, and soft-tissue domains. 3DVMs improved concordance with radiologist benchmarks, particularly among trainees (κ: 0.49→0.57). Scoring time was similar or faster with 3DVMs. Radiologists overestimated, and surgeons underestimated, tumour volumes relative to 3DVM measurements. Trainees reported enhanced anatomical understanding, procedural confidence, and educational value; consultants were more reserved. Conclusion 3DVMs provide reliable, high-fidelity visualization of complex spinal tumours, supporting accurate preoperative planning, volume estimation, and trainee education. While not a replacement for conventional imaging, 3DVMs serve as a valuable adjunct, particularly for enhancing spatial understanding and multidisciplinary communication in spinal oncology.

Article activity feed