Platinum Selection in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Based Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

The KEYNOTE-048 trial established pembrolizumab plus platinum and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as the standard first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). In the present study, the efficacy and safety of cisplatin and carboplatin in combination with pembrolizumab were compared using real-world data. In this retrospective study, 76 patients with R/M HNSCC treated with pembrolizumab plus 5-FU and either cisplatin (n=41) or carboplatin (n=35) were analysed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and the incidence of grade ≥3 haematological and grade ≥2 non-haematological adverse events. The median PFS was 4.1 months with cisplatin and 7.1 months with carboplatin (p=0.58). The median OS values were 14.8 and 20.7 months, respectively (p=0.88). The ORR values were similar (34.1% vs. 34.3%, p=0.99). Grade ≥3 haematological adverse events were more frequent with cisplatin than with carboplatin (87.8% vs. 48.6%, p<0.01), as were grade ≥2 non-haematological adverse events (97.6% vs. 54.3%, p<0.01). Cisplatin showed no advantage over carboplatin regarding OS, PFS, and ORR but caused increased toxicity in ICI-based therapy for R/M HNSCC. These findings support carboplatin as the preferred platinum with pembrolizumab, balancing efficacy and safety.

Article activity feed